Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum rules before posting.

Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free registration is required.

If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.

    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1  Previous   Next
Is parsing like BY?
Author Message
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorStaid S Barr
Registered: Oct 16, 2003
Registered: May 9, 2007
Netherlands Posts: 1,536
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Maybe I just never noticed this before, but it seems that like BY, parsing does not overwrite existing local data.

I had a recent update, with David//Ogden Stiers in the cast data. My local profile had (still has, actually) David/Ogden/Stiers. I wouldn't know one way or the other (not the point anyway), so I accepted the change. However, my local stays the same. Tried it several times too. Field is not locked.

Is this new behaviour, since otherwise all the heated past discussions would have been rather pointless, and we don't do that, do we? 

Profile is 085391604723.
Hans
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorT!M
Profiling since Dec. 2000
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Netherlands Posts: 8,736
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Staid S Barr:
Quote:
Maybe I just never noticed this before, but it seems that like BY, parsing does not overwrite existing local data.

Indeed it doesn't. The contribution system recognizes that you've already got the guy in your database, and it then uses that entry, disregarding the different parsing in the update. This change was introduced a few months ago.

Quote:
Is this new behaviour, since otherwise all the heated past discussions would have been rather pointless, and we don't do that, do we?

Unfortunately, they're not pointless at all, but still desperately needed... The problem is not in your local database, it's in the online. You have David/Ogden/Stiers (which, judging from the latest thread on the subject, is the correct way to parse it), but the online version of this profile has David//Ogden Stiers. All well and good, until you want to contribute an entirely different addition or correction to the same cast list. Whenever you try to contribute such a change, the contribution system will include the parsing change, ping-ponging it back to David/Ogden/Stiers, and you're bound to get no-votes: for starters from the user who just entered it as D//O S, an then from others saying things like "no documentation on the parsing change". The only way to prohibit this, is to change the parsing locally, then contribute the change you actually wanted to make, and then fix the parsing right bac. To prevent this horrible ordeal, often for several people within the same profile, determining the "correct" parsing remains important.

All in all: it's lovely that the acceptance system protects your local value, but as long as the contribution system doesn't ignore parsing, it's still the same old problem.
 Last edited: by T!M
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorDarklyNoon
No Godz, No Masterz
Registered: May 8, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Germany Posts: 1,945
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I also noticed that a few days ago, dunno if I like that, cuz if a person is corrected in the online database, I would like to have him corrected too in my local, but anyways, not a big deal for me

Donnie
www.tvmaze.com
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorStaid S Barr
Registered: Oct 16, 2003
Registered: May 9, 2007
Netherlands Posts: 1,536
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Thanks for explaining.
Hans
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributornorthbloke
Registered: March 15, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United Kingdom Posts: 5,459
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
It would have made a lot more sense if, like BYs, we were given a checkbox asking us if we wanted our parsing to overwrite the online parsing and vice versa. That way everyone can parse how they like without having their ability to contribute restricted.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantMuckl
That's my common name.
Registered: April 9, 2009
Reputation: Great Rating
Germany Posts: 858
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting northbloke:
Quote:
It would have made a lot more sense if, like BYs, we were given a checkbox asking us if we wanted our parsing to overwrite the online parsing and vice versa. That way everyone can parse how they like without having their ability to contribute restricted.

+10
 
1.0.1, iPhone 3GS, iOS 4.1.0

Trivia v0.3.1
My HSDB v5 additions, HTML windows and other stuff
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorAce_of_Sevens
Registered: December 10, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
Posts: 3,004
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
In the sense that it's difficult to research and cause lots of fights? yes.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorNexus the Sixth
Contributor since 2002
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
Sweden Posts: 3,197
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
At least BY is good for something. Parsing is not good for anything. 
First registered: February 15, 2002
    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1  Previous   Next