Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 Previous Next
|
Crew group dividers |
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,946 |
| | Registered: May 9, 2007 | Posts: 1,536 |
| Posted: | | | | Omitting definitely makes sense to me. | | | Hans |
| Registered: May 29, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,475 |
| Posted: | | | | Logical and follows the invelos standard for entering Crew data...therefore you are wrong! But seriously, that makes sense to me too. |
| Registered: May 9, 2007 | Posts: 1,536 |
| Posted: | | | | So in a way, we have {drum roll}... common sense. | | | Hans |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 20,111 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting cvermeylen: Quote: When entering group dividers for Visual Effects crew, do we also omit the company suffixes like inc. and ltd. ??? It would seem logical, since we omit them from studios. The rules don't technically word this out right now though... | | | Corey |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Correct, so you trying to compare an apple to an orange and calling it logical. It's not at all. Sorry | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 20,111 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Prof. Kingsfield: Quote: Correct, so you trying to compare an apple to an orange and calling it logical. It's not at all. Sorry Let's wait for Ken to decide whether or not that's true or not, shall we? | | | Corey |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | That works for me, kat. | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 Previous Next
|
|