| Author |
Message |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 6,744 |
| | Posted: | | | | And in regards to your "Keinohrhasen" contribution and your "Terminator" vote: from http://www.invelos.com/Forums.aspx?task=viewtopic&topicID=376754&messageID=1000108#M1000108Quoting Ken Cole: Quote:
The rules don't specifically cover this. We generally encourage submission of covers without stickers, and although these aren't stickers, they serve a similar purpose.
So, as long as the flip cover otherwise matches the front, I don't see a problem submitting it. PS: I would have written you a PM if your "Keinohrhasen" contribution wouldn't look like "wrong on purpose". | | | Karsten
DVD Collectors Online
 |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 2,217 |
| |
  | Berak | | Bibamus morieundum est! |
| Registered: May 10, 2007 |  Posts: 1,059 |
| | Posted: | | | | Is this something for the forums? I don't understand what the issue is, so if you post it, you should at least explain what the issue is...  | | | Berak
It's better to burn out than to fade away!
True love conquers all! |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 922 |
| | Posted: | | | | He doesn't like the fact that most of the German users choose the side of a flip cover without the new rating lable. So he scanned a cover with a picture which isn't a cover at all but a picture shown through the transparent case.  I agree, normaly this shouldn't be solved in public, but this user is a troll. He also has a history with bootleg profiles (voted against most of the delete contributions). | | | 
Deutsches DVD Profiler Forum: www.dvdprofiler-forum.de |
|
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 5,917 |
| | Posted: | | | | He said he scanned the backside (looks like the inside) of the cover. That's ... well, I'll stop here. |
|
 | W0m6at | | You're in for it now Tony |
| Registered: April 17, 2007 |  Posts: 1,091 |
| | Posted: | | | | Someone should just vote no on the grounds that the FSK logo is still (slightly) visible on the new scans. | | | | Adelaide Movie Buffs (info on special screenings, contests, bargains, etc. relevant to Adelaideans... and contests/bargains for other Aussies too!) |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 762 |
| |
| Registered: May 8, 2007 | | Posts: 823 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting SH84: Quote:
I agree, normaly this shouldn't be solved in public, but this user is a troll. He also has a history with bootleg profiles (voted against most of the delete contributions). Why isn't he banned? The fact that he isn't makes it seem like Invelos doesn't care about their online database.  | | | | 99.9% of all cat plans consist only of "Step 1." |
|
| Registered: March 15, 2007 |  Posts: 1,982 |
| | Posted: | | | | and this guy always contribute? It's sure worse than all the little detail who start so much debate in the zone 1 contribution Too bad I can't find one of his first post where he was in a quest for a contribution record. This one is so funny and pathetic at the same time  |
|
| Muckl | | That's my common name. |
| Registered: April 9, 2009 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 858 |
| |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 5,734 |
| | Posted: | | | | No Personal AttacksForum Moderator: | | | | Don't confuse while the film is playing with when the film is played. [Ken Cole, DVD Profiler Architect] | | | | Last edited: by Forum Moderator |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 5,734 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Grendell: Quote:
Quoting SH84:
Quote:
I agree, normaly this shouldn't be solved in public, but this user is a troll. He also has a history with bootleg profiles (voted against most of the delete contributions).
Why isn't he banned? The fact that he isn't makes it seem like Invelos doesn't care about their online database. Forum Moderator: no personal attacksThen community feedback to my contributions is usually quite positive:  You would have thought that's why Invelos let me do it. All the more surprising and unexpected is the current interim result, not a single Yes-vote is somewhat uncommon. | | | | Don't confuse while the film is playing with when the film is played. [Ken Cole, DVD Profiler Architect] | | | | Last edited: by Forum Moderator |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 |  Posts: 2,692 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting bbbbb: Quote:
All the more surprising and unexpected is the current interim result, not a single Yes-vote is somewhat uncommon. Sh84 - included a screen print showing your contribution of the covers - is this correct? If so, I would have thought it obvious why a copy of the inside cover wasn't suitable to replace the normal cover. | | | | Paul |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 2,217 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting pauls42: Quote:
Sh84 - included a screen print showing your contribution of the covers - is this correct? It is, or at least was at the time I gave my first answer in this thread. Quote:
If so, I would have thought it obvious why a copy of the inside cover wasn't suitable to replace the normal cover. Of course it is obvious, bbbbb most likely tries to "make a point" or "illustrate a problem" or something like it, see other thread about 'Wendecover' but his method is trolling in my humble opinion. cya, Mithi | | | | Mithi's little XSLT tinkering - the power of XML --- DVD-Profiler Mini-Wiki |
|