|
|
Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum
rules before posting.
Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free
registration is required.
If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.
|
|
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 Previous Next
|
CLT - number of profiles? |
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 5,734 |
| Posted: | | | | Good day, Sirs,
how is it that the same UPC is counted several times?
Why doesn't each UPC represents only one specific profile?
Love, bbbbb | | | Don't confuse while the film is playing with when the film is played. [Ken Cole, DVD Profiler Architect] |
| Registered: July 31, 2008 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,506 |
| Posted: | | | | The only reason that I can think of is that the same UPC can apply to more than one locality. | | | Last edited: by Ardos |
| Registered: August 7, 2007 | Posts: 185 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Forget_the_Rest: Quote: The only reason that I can think of is that the same UPC can apply to more than one region. Or to more than one locality. Here in Scandinavia there's sometimes a DVD release for Finland, Sweden, Norway and Denmark under the same UPC. |
| Registered: July 31, 2008 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,506 |
| Posted: | | | | Oops sorry, I meant locality! Thanks for spotting my "deliberate" mistake! |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 5,734 |
| Posted: | | | | Thank you, Sirs.
Too bad the CLT does not differentiate real releases with same UPC for another locality, from non-existing ones.
Who will ever update the profile of a non-existing release? At least no one who is trustworthy. Who will vote?
The problem is not the wrong numer of profiles, but that the non-existing releases with their questionable Original Titles have a bearing on the CLT title result, so affecting Common Names, with their questionable credits.
Initial contributions are handled far too careless. | | | Don't confuse while the film is playing with when the film is played. [Ken Cole, DVD Profiler Architect] |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 2,337 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting bbbbb: Quote: Thank you, Sirs.
Too bad the CLT does not differentiate real releases with same UPC for another locality, from non-existing ones. What do you mean by "non-existing" profiles. Profiles with same UPC's, but different localities are very valid entries. Different SRP, release date, currency, Rating, Rating Details... etc. |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 767 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting bbbbb: Quote:
The problem is not the wrong numer of profiles, but that the non-existing releases with their questionable Original Titles have a bearing on the CLT title result, so affecting Common Names, with their questionable credits. This also includes incorrect localities. Many times, when checking for CLT results, I look for incorrect profiles in locality UK, unfortunately the locality with the most incorrect entries due to a conversion from years ago. Mark them for deletion, while checking if the correct locality exists. It helps, but only in small steps. |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 5,734 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Kulju: Quote:
Quote: Too bad the CLT does not differentiate real releases with same UPC for another locality, from non-existing ones. What do you mean by "non-existing" profiles. Profiles with same UPC's, but different localities are very valid entries. Of course. When I asked I was not aware of the great number of un-unique UPCs ("the preferred method of entry due to the uniqueness of UPC codes"). From which the CLT only displays a partial quantity, because of faulty credits. So some exist, others don't. And others again are missing. | | | Don't confuse while the film is playing with when the film is played. [Ken Cole, DVD Profiler Architect] |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 5,734 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting marcelb7: Quote: This also includes incorrect localities. Many times, when checking for CLT results, I look for incorrect profiles in locality UK, unfortunately the locality with the most incorrect entries due to a conversion from years ago. Mark them for deletion, while checking if the correct locality exists. It helps, but only in small steps. During the last few days I thought about non-existing releases and their profiles, Sir. A german cover in a UK profile might be a piece of circumstantial evidence that that release doesn't exist. Or, the profile has only wrong images. Damn! Existence is easier to prove than non-existence. | | | Don't confuse while the film is playing with when the film is played. [Ken Cole, DVD Profiler Architect] | | | Last edited: by bbbbb |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 767 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting bbbbb: Quote: Damn! Existence is easier to prove than non-existence. |
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 Previous Next
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|