Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum rules before posting.

Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free registration is required.

If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.

    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1  Previous   Next
The Shawshank Redemption BD (053939-267525) Declined..Why?
Author Message
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorbentyman
Registered: April 13, 2007
Norway Posts: 651
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Here's my contribution votes:
"Corrected RT. Actual RT on disc is 2:22:33 = 143 with roundup. Corrected audioformat from Stereo to DD Surround, verified by receiver as it flags it as DD Surround. Rearranged as encoded to disc. Corrected overview to match cover."

YES:19  NO:1
The reason for NO vote: "Overview is better on the existing profile"
Is better? It's about Right overview, not better IMO.

Does the screeners really decline it because of that NO vote? My update to the overview matches the sheet which are glued to the book exactly. Existing one is WRONG, and not from the cover whatsoever. Is it just a glich in the (matrix) Invelos. I believe that the 19 YES voters compared my overviewupdate with their own BD so thay can see that mine is wrong. Would like some input here, so I could link to this tread if necessary 

Backcover: http://www.axelmusic.com/resources/covers/back/053939267525.jpg
Product details: http://www.axelmusic.com/productDetails/053939267525
"What's God?"
"You know when you want something really bad and you wish for it?, God's the guy that ignores you"
-The Island, Steve Buscemi
 Last edited: by bentyman
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorArdos
Registered: July 31, 2008
Reputation: High Rating
United Kingdom Posts: 2,506
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
It looks like it was declined in error.

I would resubmit it saying that you believe it was declined in error.

Also, I would add what audio you're changing. Although obvious now, in 6 months if reviewed people wont know which you're talking about.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorbentyman
Registered: April 13, 2007
Norway Posts: 651
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Forget_the_Rest:
Quote:
Also, I would add what audio you're changing. Although obvious now, in 6 months if reviewed people wont know which you're talking about.

Yes, I will do that
"What's God?"
"You know when you want something really bad and you wish for it?, God's the guy that ignores you"
-The Island, Steve Buscemi
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributortweeter
I aim to misbehave
Registered: June 12, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United States Posts: 2,665
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting bentyman:
Quote:
Here's my contribution votes:
"Corrected RT. Actual RT on disc is 2:22:33 = 143 with roundup. Corrected audioformat from Stereo to DD Surround, verified by receiver as it flags it as DD Surround. Rearranged as encoded to disc. Corrected overview to match cover."

If you actually entered the notes like this, that is one paragraph, consider adding some carriage returns between the topics (time, audio, overview).

Your overview comment is buried at the end of the paragraph otherwise.
Bad movie?  You're soaking in it!
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorbentyman
Registered: April 13, 2007
Norway Posts: 651
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
My copy, paste here, has merged it together. I separate paragraphs as I enter my notes. I believe the screeners read all notes before approving/decline it. But it might be an error though.
No big deal, I just resubmit it
"What's God?"
"You know when you want something really bad and you wish for it?, God's the guy that ignores you"
-The Island, Steve Buscemi
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorwidescreenforever
Under A Double DoubleW
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
Canada Posts: 5,494
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Isn't BluRay  Dolby Digital Plus. or in this case Dolby TrueHD 5.1 Surround mix (48kHz/16-bit).. ?
and not DD surround??  Now if you don't have the proper decoder or a digital amplifer,  you yourself will get stereo or dolby surround out of these Hi-def discs.. but the true audio output is TrueHD 5.1  ..
In the 60's, People took Acid to make the world Weird. Now the World is weird and People take Prozac to make it Normal.

Terry
 Last edited: by widescreenforever
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorbentyman
Registered: April 13, 2007
Norway Posts: 651
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting widescreenforever:
Quote:
Isn't BluRay  Dolby Digital Plus. or in this case Dolby TrueHD 5.1 Surround mix (48kHz/16-bit).. ?
and not DD surround??  Now if you don't have the proper decoder or a digital amplifer,  you yourself will get stereo or dolby surround out of these Hi-def discs.. but the true audio output is TrueHD 5.1  ..

The main audio is Dolby TrueHD, but the other languages/commentary is DD Surround (3 channels)
My amplifier (receiver) decodes all new HD formats, so this is correct. DD 2.0 is 2 channels. (stereo)
"What's God?"
"You know when you want something really bad and you wish for it?, God's the guy that ignores you"
-The Island, Steve Buscemi
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorWinston Smith
Don't be discommodious
Registered: March 13, 2007
United States Posts: 21,610
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Bentyman:

Please be sure about the audio and detail your verification. The only reason I say this is that there are many Audio tracks being changed to DD Stereo. I susppect that many users do not understand that DD2.0 means next to nothing, there is DD2.0 Mono, Stereo and Surround. I think they see DD2.0 and assume it is Stereo, when in my experience MOST DD2.0 tracks are actually DD2.0 Surround, but that may not be true in BD, so just be sure to document it, amigo.

Skip
ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here

Billy Video
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorBerak
Bibamus morieundum est!
Registered: May 10, 2007
Norway Posts: 1,059
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Looks like an error on Invelos' part. Try resubmitting...
Berak

It's better to burn out than to fade away!
True love conquers all!
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorDarklyNoon
No Godz, No Masterz
Registered: May 8, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Germany Posts: 1,945
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I would also resubmit it, I don 't see anything wrong with your contribution

greets
Donnie
www.tvmaze.com
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorbentyman
Registered: April 13, 2007
Norway Posts: 651
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Dr Pavlov:
Quote:
Bentyman:

Please be sure about the audio and detail your verification. The only reason I say this is that there are many Audio tracks being changed to DD Stereo. I susppect that many users do not understand that DD2.0 means next to nothing, there is DD2.0 Mono, Stereo and Surround. I think they see DD2.0 and assume it is Stereo, when in my experience MOST DD2.0 tracks are actually DD2.0 Surround, but that may not be true in BD, so just be sure to document it, amigo.

Skip

Aye, Aye Skip
"What's God?"
"You know when you want something really bad and you wish for it?, God's the guy that ignores you"
-The Island, Steve Buscemi
    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1  Previous   Next