I vote "No" for such, as well.  (But I won't go into the uncredited unless I know something about that particular title.)

There is nothing in the rules that require anybody to do a full audit.  If someone is adding good data, and not removing other good data, you can't vote 'no'.  Partial contributions are allowed.  While I don't like it, it is something that Gerri has confirmed.

I figure that as long as they are correcting bad data and not actually introducing NEW bad data, I'll happily vote yes.

Edit: Or, what midnitoil said... ;P

I vote yes on small changes like that.

The way I look at it, sure the contributor could be making more changes, but the information being submitted is still correct, so there's no legitimate reason to not vote yes on it, in my mind.

I also try and keep this in mind especially if it's a Canadian locality profile. The contributors for the Canadian section of my dvd's is much much smaller than for the U.S. section of my DVD's. (I'm still shocked at the number of Canadian DVD's that I had to enter that were BIG title releases). So any help is muchly appreciated.

And not everyone is as annoyingly anal retentive as I am. While submitting the changes for Robert Downey, Jr. for the new filter set-up, I found myself pouring over every detail of the dvd and basically doing a full audit. Not everyone would do that, a ton would simply submit it for the Jr. name and move on... Gotta keep in mind not everyone works the same way I do.

Merrick,

Yup that is what I am now doing... 'data contributed=good'? then yup...

Especially if you are the contributor hahaha 

Eric

Quote:
Quoting Skip:
Correct data is correct data, if the new data is correct then it is NOT allowed in the Rules for you to judge whether it is "enough."
Skip

This is why I have revised my position.. if it is 'good' then by all mean (following a conversation with Merrik I am going with a full 'yes' instead)... meh, at least the data is corrected one baby step (in some cases) at a time!!

Eric