Quoting hal9g:

Quote:
Quoting 8ballMax:

Quote:

Well, according to the revised rules:

DVD Title from DVD Cover "Zombie Holocaust"
Original Title, first from Credit Block or if no title in credit block, from film's credits. So Original title would be "Zombie Holocaust: Dr. Butcher M.D." from the credit block.

You keep getting this wrong.

The Rules actually say "Copyright Title" not "Credit Block".

Don't insult our intelligence . That was a legacy from the Possessives update that wasn't also corrected and you darn well know it.

Quoting hal9g:

Quote:
I see.

So because you say it is incorrect and should have been changed in the Rules, then we should naturally accept that.

I stand corrected.

It was brought up in another thread Hal. I wasn't the only one that pointed out that fact...so don't lay it at my doorstep.

Quoting 8ballMax:

Quote:
Quoting hal9g:

Quote:
Quoting 8ballMax:

Quote:

Well, according to the revised rules:

DVD Title from DVD Cover "Zombie Holocaust"
Original Title, first from Credit Block or if no title in credit block, from film's credits. So Original title would be "Zombie Holocaust: Dr. Butcher M.D." from the credit block.

You keep getting this wrong.

The Rules actually say "Copyright Title" not "Credit Block".

Don't insult our intelligence . That was a legacy from the Possessives update that wasn't also corrected and you darn well know it.

You can add me as another person who thinks you are not looking at the same rules.

The rules show an update at 12 October with the new rules being:

Original Title
The Original Title field serves two general purposes, but in both cases allows for the tracking of the original feature title. Use the title from the copyright notice if available, otherwise from the film's credits. In cases where the title is the original title, leave the Original Title field blank.

The highlighting is what Ken has done. Not me.

Simple. Some users take argumenting as a sport at this time this the "title" game, so everytime they can they show up and play.

Not sure how the exact wording of the Rules can be construed as "spin", but there ya go!

Will you come here and eat crow when it is accepted?

If quoting the exact wording of the Rules is "spin" what do you call quoting a fabricated Rule as your reason for voting "no"? 

Your reason for voting "no": "Rules state to take Original Title from Credit Block first:"

Actual Rule: "Use the title from the copyright notice if available, otherwise from the film's credits."

That's good.

You cannot offer a reasonable explanation, so...........

Quoting 8ballMax:

Quote:
Quoting hal9g:

Quote:
That's good.

You cannot offer a reasonable explanation, so...........

So...nothing. I already gave you an explanation regarding that discrepancy in the Original Title rule and you chose to disregard it.

At least one other user, Unicas69, agreed here that the Original Title Rule should be amended to reflect the same clarification that was added to the Possessive's Rule.

The difference is, that Unicus voted in line with what the Rules currently say as opposed to what he thinks they ought to say!

And while you're at it,  please explain why the "Modified Title" rule does not apply to "M:i:III".