Nor are you and I do not appreciate your double standards, your making up of Rules to suit yourself and your flat out erratic voting. Or yourrefusal revisit of titles that get modified to vote yes, that alone tells me that you have an agenda or worse.

BTW James, I have not lied about you. I can back up everything I have said. I can include your notes, and the titles including one today which you voted for Tim, or maybe yesterday, once again without demanding documentation but only accepting his lame CLAIM that he checked the CLT and EXTENSIVELY researched everything but provides no information about that research, coupled with your equally claim remark that he does not need to provide even so much as CLT results.

So stop your whining, you don't follow the Rules (never have in reality). like I said James I can back everything up including the Cover Art which you ERRONEOUSLY voted Yes to...Sorry, Wrong Number.

Skip

Rick:

I am not the one trying defend what is essentially indefensible behavior.

Skip

Trust me James, that is NOT the only mistake you make in your voting. You make a ton of them , and you have had a hand in allowing much bad data into the database.

And as long as you continue to support lame notes by Tim or anyone else, then you have no right to DEMAND sources when I provide far more detail in my notes than anything Tim has ever Contributed, or most other users for that matter.

You are wrong and you don't like being called on it and i can appreciate that, but it does NOT change the fact that you are WRONG and that you applly a double standard when voting.

Make light of the Cover Art if you wish, it was a bad Contribution and you voted to accept it. Thank God, the Screeners saw it correctly.

I find your defense of your sloppy voting to be very bad form at the very least and your Double Standards to down right reprehensible. Sorry, pal, that's the way i see it and that is why you have me blocked, you have tried to set yourself up as the ultimate arbiter of the rules. Your view is the ONLY possible correct, even though your logic is badly flawed just as it was with the overview, and you can't go tote to toe with logic so you don't. You are so far off base it isn't even amusing, sad but not amusing. You fairly clearly do have an obvious agenda and THAT sir, is a very bad thing.

Skip

Quoting Jubal:

Quote:
Trust me James, that is NOT the only mistake you make in your voting. You make a ton of them , and you have had a hand in allowing much bad data into the database.

And as long as you continue to support lame notes by Tim or anyone else, then you have no right to DEMAND sources when I provide far more detail in my notes than anything Tim has ever Contributed, or most other users for that matter.

You are wrong and you don't like being called on it and i can appreciate that, but it does NOT change the fact that you are WRONG and that you applly a double standard when voting.

Make light of the Cover Art if you wish, it was a bad Contribution and you voted to accept it. Thank God, the Screeners saw it correctly.

I find your defense of your sloppy voting to be very bad form at the very least and your Double Standards to down right reprehensible. Sorry, pal, that's the way i see it and that is why you have me blocked, you have tried to set yourself up as the ultimate arbiter of the rules. Your view is the ONLY possible correct, even though your logic is badly flawed just as it was with the overview, and you can't go tote to toe with logic so you don't. You are so far off base it isn't even amusing, sad but not amusing. You fairly clearly do have an obvious agenda and THAT sir, is a very bad thing.

Skip

I have no agenda. I find it laughable about the cover art because you try to threaten me with that whenever I post. It's getting a little old. I don't even know what contribution you are talking about. I'm sorry I made a mistake, if indeed this is something that actually happened. I'm glad you and the screeners caught it and that all is well.

And I'll continue to demand that you source your changes outside of your personal knowledge. "Detail" that comes only from your personal knowledge is laughable and unacceptable. I'll vote 'no' on that every time.

I have no problem discussing issues logically with anyone. My problem with discussing them with you in PMs is that you use the cloak of privacy to insult me. I don't need that. I get enough of that in the forums from you and in your venomous contribution notes.

Quoting m.cellophane:

Quote:
Quoting Jubal:

Quote:
Trust me James, that is NOT the only mistake you make in your voting. You make a ton of them , and you have had a hand in allowing much bad data into the database.

And as long as you continue to support lame notes by Tim or anyone else, then you have no right to DEMAND sources when I provide far more detail in my notes than anything Tim has ever Contributed, or most other users for that matter.

You are wrong and you don't like being called on it and i can appreciate that, but it does NOT change the fact that you are WRONG and that you applly a double standard when voting.

Make light of the Cover Art if you wish, it was a bad Contribution and you voted to accept it. Thank God, the Screeners saw it correctly.

I find your defense of your sloppy voting to be very bad form at the very least and your Double Standards to down right reprehensible. Sorry, pal, that's the way i see it and that is why you have me blocked, you have tried to set yourself up as the ultimate arbiter of the rules. Your view is the ONLY possible correct, even though your logic is badly flawed just as it was with the overview, and you can't go tote to toe with logic so you don't. You are so far off base it isn't even amusing, sad but not amusing. You fairly clearly do have an obvious agenda and THAT sir, is a very bad thing.

Skip

I have no agenda. I find it laughable about the cover art because you try to threaten me with that whenever I post. It's getting a little old. I don't even know what contribution you are talking about. I'm sorry I made a mistake, if indeed this is something that actually happened. I'm glad you and the screeners caught it and that all is well.

And I'll continue to demand that you source your changes outside of your personal knowledge. "Detail" that comes only from your personal knowledge is laughable and unacceptable. I'll vote 'no' on that every time.

I have no problem discussing issues logically with anyone. My problem with discussing them with you in PMs is that you use the cloak of privacy to insult me. I don't need that. I get enough of that in the forums from you and in your venomous contribution notes.

Now there is a falsehood, if i ever saw one. So you will continue to use a double standard..why am I not surprised., and that is insulting on its face.

BTW James you go on about me insulting you in Updated Notes, has it occurred to you that I am highly insulted when you try to create Rules which don't exist, or ignore Rules that DO. Or when you apply your double standard, or after I have made a correction and sometimes even thanked you, but you choose then not to vote. It's OK for you to vote No, but you don't feel that when something is fixed you shouldthen vote Yes, sorry my friend that simply doesn't hold water.As long as feel perfectly secure in insulting me, then don't go on should i insult you.

Skip

Quoting lyonsden5:

Quote:
Either way can we just agree to disagree and move on?

OK by me.