|
|
Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum
rules before posting.
Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free
registration is required.
If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.
|
|
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 2 3 4 5 6 Previous Next
|
Location Unit Credits |
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,635 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Unicus69: Quote: Quoting skipnet50:
Quote: In fact according to the poll that was taken, RESTORATION CREW and SPECIAL EDITION CREW should not be used and the ones that have been inserted should be removed, at least for now, untill such time as we can differentiate them better.
Skip
Polls are not rules, they are a guage of opinion. To be clear, they are a guage of forum user opinion. As I said, these crew members were submitted, with notes stating what they were, and Gerri accepted them. There is no reason, in the rules, to exclude or remove them...especially now that we have dividers. So anytime something gets submitted with notes explaining the change and Gerri accepts it, that type of change can then can be considered to be part of the Rules going forward? That's good to know. | | | Hal |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | I understand where you are going, hal. I have no opinion, because we have to remember that Gerri does not have all the information. As I noted I had forgotten that poll, so I can't expect Gerri to remmember or perhaps even be aware of it. However, this does make a case for complete notes allowing gerri to access any relevant information to try and resolve these questions.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
| Registered: August 22, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,807 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote: I understand where you are going, hal. I have no opinion, because we have to remember that Gerri does not have all the information. As I noted I had forgotten that poll, so I can't expect Gerri to remmember or perhaps even be aware of it. However, this does make a case for complete notes allowing gerri to access any relevant information to try and resolve these questions.
Skip I, for one,submitted Restoration Crew, with some very explicit Contribution notes, for My Fair Lady. The contribution was just that, "Added Restoration credits from end credits, separated with a divider ("The Restoration") as on screen", and a link to the Forum. It got all (20) YES votes, including skipnet50 and hal9g, and it was approved. | | | -- Enry |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,635 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting EnryWiki: Quote:
I, for one,submitted Restoration Crew, with some very explicit Contribution notes, for My Fair Lady. The contribution was just that, "Added Restoration credits from end credits, separated with a divider ("The Restoration") as on screen", and a link to the Forum. It got all (20) YES votes, including skipnet50 and hal9g, and it was approved. Can I take back my vote? | | | Hal |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting hal9g: Quote: So anytime something gets submitted with notes explaining the change and Gerri accepts it, that type of change can then can be considered to be part of the Rules going forward?
That's good to know. Nice tactic...when your argument falls flat, switch to sarcasm. That is not what I said. You are claiming that this is not allowed. The rules do not back you up. Spin it any way you want, but you just can't get past that little fact. The rules do not exclude these credits, which is what I said. Gerri has been accepting these credits. Based on those two things, I have to conclude that they are allowed...unless Ken or Gerri steps in and says otherwise. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
| Registered: March 18, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,550 |
| Posted: | | | | Well, since this will never be resolved until Gerri or Ken chime in (I won't hold my breath), I've submitted my contribution that includes the art director in question. I would've left it off if that person wasn't in the database but she is and has worked on major projects in the past. | | | Last edited: by The Movieman |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,635 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Unicus69: Quote: The rules do not exclude these credits, which is what I said. You keep repeating this but you refuse to state that other credits which are also "not excluded" by the Rules are allowable, like Assistant Producer or Associate Art Director. If you truly wish to argue that anything that is not excluded is therefore allowable, then you must allow any credit that anyone feels is equivalent or close to any of the existing allowable credits. Quoting Unicus69: Quote: Gerri has been accepting these credits. Based on those two things, I have to conclude that they are allowed...unless Ken or Gerri steps in and says otherwise. I've already addressed this. Gerri let's a lot of blatantly wrong stuff into the database. Just because you combine one piece of questionable supporting evidence with another piece of questionable supporting evidence does not give either any more credence, nor does it make your overall argument any stronger. Nice try though. | | | Hal |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Movieman:
I have to tell you if I see it i will vote absolutely NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! We don't do unti/location crews.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video | | | Last edited: by Winston Smith |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,911 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote: Movieman:
I have to tell you if I see it i will vote absolutely NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! We don't do unti/location crews.
Skip Who is this we? Got a mouse in your pocket? | | | Signature banned: Reason out of date... |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting hal9g: Quote: Quoting Unicus69:
Quote: The rules do not exclude these credits, which is what I said.
You keep repeating this but you refuse to state that other credits which are also "not excluded" by the Rules are allowable, like Assistant Producer or Associate Art Director. If you truly wish to argue that anything that is not excluded is therefore allowable, then you must allow any credit that anyone feels is equivalent or close to any of the existing allowable credits. Please pay attention. I will try and make this as simple as possible. The credit in DVDP is 'ART DIRECTOR'. As long as a person is credited with that role, they can be entered in DVDP. There is no 'Assistant Producer' role in DVDP. That means it can NOT be entered. Do you understand now or are you going to continue being purposely obtuse? I really thought I had explained this earlier. I guess I was wrong. Quote:
Quoting Unicus69:
Quote: Gerri has been accepting these credits. Based on those two things, I have to conclude that they are allowed...unless Ken or Gerri steps in and says otherwise.
I've already addressed this. Gerri let's a lot of blatantly wrong stuff into the database. Just because you combine one piece of questionable supporting evidence with another piece of questionable supporting evidence does not give either any more credence, nor does it make your overall argument any stronger.
Nice try though. At least my argument has supporting evidence. Your argument is based on some 'user convention' that you claim everybody is using. Please be so kind as to provide some evidence, any evidence, to support your claim. And, yea, I know I am going to come off sounding like an @$$ here but, it's been a long day and I don't feel like re-editing my post. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar | | | Last edited: by TheMadMartian |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,635 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Unicus69: Quote:
Please pay attention. I will try and make this as simple as possible. The credit in DVDP is 'ART DIRECTOR'. As long as a person is credited with that role, they can be entered in DVDP. There is no 'Assistant Producer' role in DVDP. That means it can NOT be entered. Do you understand now or are you going to continue being purposely obtuse? Your condescension is not appreciated! You stated flatly that if a credit is "not excluded" in the Rules, that it is allowable. Shall I go back and point to the exact post. That may not have been what you meant, but it is what you said. Furthermore, the "divider" for that section of the crew, IMHO, is part of their rolename in the very same way that information in a divider in the cast is also part of the rolename; e.g.: Cast list: John Doe Jane Doe Dancers Larry Jones Sam Jones Mary Jones The divider is entered as the rolename for Larry, Sam and Mary in DVDP. It is part of the description of that person. When Art Directors fall under a "divider" such as a "Unit" designator, then that is also part of their role description. There is no allowance for "New York Unit Art Director" in the Rules. Quoting Unicus69: Quote: At least my argument has supporting evidence. Your argument is based on some 'user convention' that you claim everybody is using. Please be so kind as to provide some evidence, any evidence, to support your claim.
My evidence is simply the use of the program for eight plus years during which time in the thousands of profiles that I have personally edited or voted on, unit crew have always been excluded or voted down. You may not feel that my experience during that period of time is worth two cents, but to me it is a very good indicator of what has been going on for a very long time. | | | Hal | | | Last edited: by hal9g |
| Registered: August 22, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,807 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting hal9g: Quote: My evidence is simply the use of the program for eight plus years during which time in the thousands of profiles that I have personally edited or voted on, unit crew have always been excluded or voted down. You may not feel that my experience during that period of time is worth two cents, but to me it is a very good indicator of what has been going on for a very long time. I agree, but for a similar reason I think we should go on entering Restoration Crew as it has been done for a while now. Changing and changing again is the worst policy, in my view. | | | -- Enry | | | Last edited: by White Pongo, Jr. |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,635 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting EnryWiki: Quote:
I agree, but for a similar reason I think we should go on entering Restoration Crew as it has been done for a while now. Changing and changing again is the worst policy, in my view. Sorry, but entering of Restoration crew has been a relatively recent development. At most, it has been done for the past year since dividers were introduced to the program. Use of dividers for this purpose is not supported by anything in the Rules. It is strictly a personal preference for using dividers. | | | Hal |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 3,830 |
| Posted: | | | | | | | Sources for one or more of the changes and/or additions were not submitted. Please include the sources for your changes in the contribution notes, especially for cast and crew additions. |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting hal9g: Quote: Your condescension is not appreciated! And I knew it wouldn't be. As I said, I knew I was going to come off looking like an @$$. Quote: You stated flatly that if a credit is "not excluded" in the Rules, that it is allowable. Shall I go back and point to the exact post.
That may not have been what you meant, but it is what you said. I meant exactly what I said. The problem is, you are taking that statement out of context. You asked why this keeps coming up. To that question, I answered, "Because the rules don't say they have to be excluded." You took that answer out of context and, for some reason I can't figure out, are continuing to do so. That statement was an answer to a specific question and had nothing to do with what is and isn't allowed by the rules. Despite that fact, I have clarified that statement, at least, 4 times. Quote: Furthermore, the "divider" for that section of the crew, IMHO, is part of their rolename in the very same way that information in a divider in the cast is also part of the rolename; e.g.:
Cast list:
John Doe Jane Doe
Dancers Larry Jones Sam Jones Mary Jones
The divider is entered as the rolename for Larry, Sam and Mary in DVDP. It is part of the description of that person.
When Art Directors fall under a "divider" such as a "Unit" designator, then that is also part of their role description.
There is no allowance for "New York Unit Art Director" in the Rules.
How about in a case like: New York Cops Sam Jones Det. Smith Mary Jones Officer Sanders Are you saying that the role, in these cases, becomes part of the role name? Does it get entered as, 'Sam Jones as New York Cops Det. Smith'? I don't think it does. The only time the divider becomes the role is when the person does not have an individual role. In the case of the art director, he has an individual role. Quote:
My evidence is simply the use of the program for eight plus years during which time in the thousands of profiles that I have personally edited or voted on, unit crew have always been excluded or voted down. You may not feel that my experience during that period of time is worth two cents, but to me it is a very good indicator of what has been going on for a very long time. My registration date at Intervocative was 'May of 2001'. I was using the program for a while before that, so I have been around almost as long as you have...not that it has anything to do with anything. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 2 3 4 5 6 Previous Next
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|