|
|
Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum
rules before posting.
Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free
registration is required.
If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.
|
|
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 2 3 4 5 6 ...10 Previous Next
|
Slip Case Change in Case Types |
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
| T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,738 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Gadgeteer: Quote: If the slip case has 1 unit inside then use what's inside for the parent and any children if applicable. If the slip case has more than 1 unit then the parent should be slip case and the children use the inside case. Agreed! Quoting northbloke: Quote: The way I read it is: if there are child profiles attached, then we use the case type of whatever holds the child profiles together. If there are no child profiles, then we use the case type of whatever contains the disc(s). I understand why you would say that, but again: think of TV-sets. While the rules now DO allow those who want them to add child profiles to TV sets, they're NOT required. In most cases, I don't use them. So it would not be practical to determine the case type based on the fact whether there are child profiles or not, because that may be different for different users. IMHO, Gadgeteer's conclusion (above) is the right one. |
| | T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,738 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting ya_shin: Quote: Quoting reybr:
Quote: And we don't know if that's how Ken wants us to handle it. The first part of his post makes it look like that, but the second part tells us the exact opposite (at least that is how I read it). While I agree that it may need further clarification from Ken, I understand unicus' explanation that way, that we have to see Ken's two sentences as separate statements.
First: The slip case cover type is intended to be used when it is the only case for the profile, as in for a box set. Therefore, if it is a Box Set profile, the Slip case is the only case for that profile, as the inner case(s), like digipak, will not be for the parent but the children.
Then: If there is only one inner case, use the inner case type. If it is a single-profile DVD, then there would be several cases for that profile, the Slip Case and then the inner one; digipak or whatever. Here we choose the inner one.
TV Series, which don't necessarily have child profiles, will therefore have the inner case type. Couldn't have said it any better - this is indeed exactly how I understand Ken's clarification, and it's also exactly how myself, and quite a lot of other users, have been using the "case type" field for years. |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,436 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting T!M: Quote: Couldn't have said it any better - this is indeed exactly how I understand Ken's clarification, and it's also exactly how myself, and quite a lot of other users, have been using the "case type" field for years. Even though it means that Alien Quadrilogy remains Slip Case...? If that is so, then YEAH, we are in the same boat now | | | Achim [諾亞信; Ya-Shin//Nuo], a German in Taiwan. Registered: May 29, 2000 (at InterVocative) |
| | T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,738 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting ya_shin: Quote: Quoting T!M:
Quote: Couldn't have said it any better - this is indeed exactly how I understand Ken's clarification, and it's also exactly how myself, and quite a lot of other users, have been using the "case type" field for years. Even though it means that Alien Quadrilogy remains Slip Case...? If that is so, then YEAH, we are in the same boat now No, then not, obviously... That is then the only thing we still disagree about: If there is only one inner case, use the inner case type - that's exactly what applies to the 'Alien' set. I see where you went wrong, now, this is how I see it: Quoting ya_shin - but edited by me: Quote: First: The slip case cover type is intended to be used when it is the only case for the profile, as in for a box set. Therefore, if it is a Box Set profile, the Slip case is the only case for that profile, as the inner cases, be it separate keepcases/snappers/digipaks/whatever, will not be for the parent but the children. If the contents of the slip cover are not multiple, separately packaged contents, we use the inside (cfr. "If there is only one inner case, use the inner case type"). The 'Alien' set does not have separately packaged contents, but only one inner case, se we use the inner. I was so happy that we at least agreed on TV-sets and single-movie-profiles, that I overlooked this. But there is no reason why we should refer to, say, a 'Frasier'-set as a "digipak" and the 'Alien'-set as a "slip cover", as they're both digipaks-in-a-slipcover (as, again, most digipaks). We shouldn't refer to the same kind of packaging as two different case types - there is simply no justification for that. | | | Last edited: by T!M |
| Registered: March 18, 2007 | Posts: 426 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Unicus69: Quote:
Third, I don't know why you think Ken should have modified this rule long ago. Sorry, wrong wording from my side ("he should already long have modified the rules"). I meant that as soon as he posted the clarification on the forum, he should immediately have adapted the webpage with the rules. |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,436 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting T!M: Quote: I was so happy that we at least agreed on TV-sets and single-movie-profiles, that I overlooked this. But there is no reason why we should refer to, say, a 'Frasier'-set as a "digipak" and the 'Alien'-set as a "slip cover", as they're both digipaks-in-a-slipcover (as, again, most digipaks). We shouldn't refer to the same kind of packaging as two different case types - there is simply no justification for that. Well, I see it similar, just the other way round There is no reason why we should refer to, say, the The Godfather DVD Collection as a "slip case" and the 'Alien'-set as a "dogopak", as they're both digipaks- in-a-slipcover. We shouldn't refer to the same kind of packaging as two different case types - there is simply no justification for that. I guess ultimately we'll have to agree to disagree in this last point. It simply depends which way you approach the situation. Maybe Ken will explain which interpretation was his intent, maybe he won't. | | | Achim [諾亞信; Ya-Shin//Nuo], a German in Taiwan. Registered: May 29, 2000 (at InterVocative) |
| | T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,738 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting ya_shin: Quote: There is no reason why we should refer to, say, the The Godfather DVD Collection as a "slip case" and the 'Alien'-set as a "dogopak", as they're both digipaks-in-a-slipcover. I'd say you've bolded the wrong part... There IS a clear difference: the major difference is that one houses the discs in ONE digipak, and the other houses the discs in multiple digipaks. A collection of multiple, separately packaged discs in an outer case/cover/whatever - that's what we used to call a "box set", and what we from now shall call a "slip case". The 'Alien' set is no such thing: it is NOT a container with a number of separately packaged discs: it is ONE digipak. Dixit Ken's clarification - If there is only one inner case, use the inner case type - we call it a digipak. I'm certainly not going to agree to disagree - your way would still change thousands and thousands of "digipaks" into "slip cases" - for instance the 'Frasier'-sets that I referred to. Polls have shown time and time again that everyone sees these as "digipaks", and that's what they should stay. Again, Ken clearly said: If there is only one inner case, use the inner case type. Doesn't matter whether we're talking about 'Frasier' or 'Alien' sets - it applies accross the board. | | | Last edited: by T!M |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,436 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting T!M: Quote: I'd say you've bolded the wrong part... There IS a clear difference: the major difference is that one houses the discs in ONE digipak, and the other houses the discs in multiple digipaks. A collection of multiple, separately packaged discs in an outer case/cover/whatever - that's what we used to call a "box set", and what we from now shall call a "slip case". The 'Alien' set is no such thing: it is NOT a container with a number of separately packaged discs: it is ONE digipak. Dixit Ken's clarification - If there is only one inner case, use the inner case type - we call it a digipak. I could say now, that you are applying the wrong sentence of what Ken said, you should be using "The slip case cover type is intended to be used when it is the only case for the profile, as in for a box set." instead. It means, that if there is a parent profile, then it only has one case, being that of the box. If there are no child profiles then there are multiple cases available to the profile (inner or outer), where you should then choose the inner case (hence: "If there is only one inner case, use the inner case type"). It is obviously depending how you look at it, as I said above, and how you interpret the sentences. That is why I suggested to give it a rest until there is further clarification. Quote: I'm certainly not going to agree to disagree Fine. Quote: - your way would still change thousands and thousands of "digipaks" into "slip cases" - for instance the 'Frasier'-sets that I referred to. I already clarified above, following what unicus said, that the TV Sets would not be affected. | | | Achim [諾亞信; Ya-Shin//Nuo], a German in Taiwan. Registered: May 29, 2000 (at InterVocative) |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 2,694 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting ya_shin: Quote: Quoting reybr:
Quote: And we don't know if that's how Ken wants us to handle it. The first part of his post makes it look like that, but the second part tells us the exact opposite (at least that is how I read it). While I agree that it may need further clarification from Ken, I understand unicus' explanation that way, that we have to see Ken's two sentences as separate statements.
First: The slip case cover type is intended to be used when it is the only case for the profile, as in for a box set. Therefore, if it is a Box Set profile, the Slip case is the only case for that profile, as the inner case(s), like digipak, will not be for the parent but the children.
Then: If there is only one inner case, use the inner case type. If it is a single-profile DVD, then there would be several cases for that profile, the Slip Case and then the inner one; digipak or whatever. Here we choose the inner one.
TV Series, which don't necessarily have child profiles, will therefore have the inner case type. But because they CAN have child profiles, you have to follow the same criteria as any other box set, otherwise you haven't solved a bloody thing. | | | John
"Extremism in the defense of Liberty is no vice!" Senator Barry Goldwater, 1964 Make America Great Again! |
| | T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,738 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Rifter: Quote: Quoting ya_shin:
Quote: TV Series, which don't necessarily have child profiles, will therefore have the inner case type.
But because they CAN have child profiles, you have to follow the same criteria as any other box set, otherwise you haven't solved a bloody thing. Once again: whether a set has child profiles attached, doesn't influence what packaging it comes in. This is something that everyone agrees on, despite our debates about other aspects of the "case type" field. I'll repeat myself: whether a profile has child profiles attachted to it or not, does not influence how it's packaged. It's really very simple: a keepcase with one movie (no slipcover or anything like that, no children) is a keepcase, and a keepcase with two movies (again, no slipcover or anything, but with child profiles for both movies) is also a keepcase. Honestly: we're all clear on that - you're the only one who doesn't seem to be able to grasp this. You want to use the "case type" field to indicate something other than packaging - you used to call two movies in a single keepcase a "box set". Well, you were wrong, as lots of people have told you. And with Ken changing the name to "slip case", you can no longer do this. Start another poll if you like - you'll find that there everyone is in agreement on this. It would help this debate if you wouldn't keep inserting these ridiculous statements into it... | | | Last edited: by T!M |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Tim:
All I will say is you are thinking far too narrowly. Open it up, amigo. If it helps see my note in the parallel thread.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
| | T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,738 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote: All I will say is you are thinking far too narrowly. Open it up, amigo. If it helps see my note in the parallel thread. I seriously don't see what you mean. My post that you replied to was only about the fact that Rifter wants to decide the case type based on whether it has child profiles or not. Currently he uses "box set" (now that we still have it, that is, after Ken's change he'll have to change his behaviour) as a case type for a single keepcase (no slipcase!) containing two discs with separate movies. He can't help but thinking: "there's child profiles, so it's a box set". The only thing I said was that we do not, and should not, decide on a case type based on whether there are child profiles involved. It's about the packaging, nothing else. How am I thinking narrowly with this? Do you disagree with what I've said in that post? | | | Last edited: by T!M |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,635 |
| Posted: | | | | Stargate SG-1 Seasons (the early releases with 5 keepcases in a slip case) are a prime example.
Surely we're not suggesting that the parent should be 'Keepcase'? | | | Hal |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 906 |
| Posted: | | | | Not at all, Hal. That has more than one unit in it and should have slip case (at the moment box set). This is covered by the "first release rule" | | | The colour of her eyes, were the colour of insanity |
| | Dan W | Registered: May 9, 2002 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 980 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Ken Cole: Quote: The slip case cover type is intended to be used when it is the only case for the profile, as in for a box set. This sentence is speaking of intent. It does not give any directives. Quoting Ken Cole: Quote: If there is only one inner case, use the inner case type. This sentence is clearly giving instructions. | | | Dan |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,635 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting reybr: Quote: Not at all, Hal. That has more than one unit in it and should have slip case (at the moment box set). This is covered by the "first release rule" I may have mis-read, but I thought someone was advocating that Slip Case was not to be used for TV Sets. Content should not dictate in any way what case type should be selected, IMHO. | | | Hal |
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 2 3 4 5 6 ...10 Previous Next
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|