Author |
Message |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 1,242 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Unicus69: Quote: Quoting Forget_the_Rest:
Quote: Following the rules to the letter, TV series & direct to DVD films shouldn't have a "Production Year". Since that is obviously not the case, I honestly believe that either the rule should be updated as advised by several or change the field name (or both). That is, partially, incorrect. While the rules do not address direct to DVD releases, they do address TV series. If you look at the 'TV Series on DVD' section, it tells you what to enter for the production year. I think some people in these forum's, (not you directly Unicus), should re-read the rules regarding this as recent had a discussion regard people try to state that disc x should have a different production year to the rest, even though it was for episodes more than half way through a season/series. Steve |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 17,334 |
| Posted: | | | | That is actually possible Steve... at least for the child profiles as each child profile will have it's own production year depending only on the episodes on that particular disc. | | | Pete |
|
Registered: July 31, 2008 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,506 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Addicted2DVD: Quote: That is actually possible Steve... at least for the child profiles as each child profile will have it's own production year depending only on the episodes on that particular disc. Going by the rules, it's the start of the season that's used, not the episodes - Quote: Complete Series/Season - Use the year that the Series/Season was produced and first aired in its country of origin. TV series are typically spread over a date range for a season, for example 2002-2003, for DVD Profiler purposes this will be entered as the beginning of the season; from the example the entry would be 2002. |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,635 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Forget_the_Rest: Quote: Quoting Addicted2DVD:
Quote: That is actually possible Steve... at least for the child profiles as each child profile will have it's own production year depending only on the episodes on that particular disc.
Going by the rules, it's the start of the season that's used, not the episodes -
Quote: Complete Series/Season - Use the year that the Series/Season was produced and first aired in its country of origin. TV series are typically spread over a date range for a season, for example 2002-2003, for DVD Profiler purposes this will be entered as the beginning of the season; from the example the entry would be 2002. This part of the Rules pertains to the Parent TV Season profile (the complete season). The Child profiles are to follow the "standard contribution Rules", not the TV Rules.. Applying the standard profile Rules you would use the Production Year for what is on that Disc, not a completely different profile. | | | Hal | | | Last edited: by hal9g |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 17,334 |
| Posted: | | | | Like Hal said... that is for the Parent profiles only. The disc level profiles is a completely different thing. | | | Pete |
|
Registered: January 5, 2008 | Posts: 61 |
| Posted: | | | | This is a confusing subject, cause it says 'Production Year' in DVD Profiler. So not a lot of people go check the rules to clarify. So it should perhaps be a bit clearer. Either change the text in DVD Profiler, or change the rules. I would rather have it be the actual production year as it says in the software. Cause thats the information I want to know when looking at a year. It might be a personal opinion but it would make things a lot easier. Just use the year stated on the DVD release instead of looking it up in search engines to try and find the release year. |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 762 |
| Posted: | | | | I understand "production year" as the year the movie was made/filmed. To me it's different from the "release year" (not talking about the DVD release year here), which to me means the year the movie was released/shown at movie theaters or on TV.
The wording is the problem, that's just my 2 cents.
Dirk |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting hal9g: Quote: This part of the Rules pertains to the Parent TV Season profile (the complete season).
The Child profiles are to follow the "standard contribution Rules", not the TV Rules.. Applying the standard profile Rules you would use the Production Year for what is on that Disc, not a completely different profile. Yea, but then you run into the 'Theatrical Release Date' problem again. That problem being, TV episodes don't have one. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,635 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Unicus69: Quote: Quoting hal9g:
Quote: This part of the Rules pertains to the Parent TV Season profile (the complete season).
The Child profiles are to follow the "standard contribution Rules", not the TV Rules.. Applying the standard profile Rules you would use the Production Year for what is on that Disc, not a completely different profile. Yea, but then you run into the 'Theatrical Release Date' problem again. That problem being, TV episodes don't have one. Yes, of course that is technically correct. I think most people would agree that for TV episodes this would be equivalent to the air-date. Uh-oh...I'm in trouble....I'm agreeing to "functional equivalents"!!!!!! Personally, I view TV in my home theater, so it's a theatrical release in my case anyway! | | | Hal | | | Last edited: by hal9g |
|
Registered: June 21, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,621 |
| Posted: | | | | I'd also love to see it just changed to the copyright year that shows in the end credits, then we could always add a field for theatrical release(s) as well. The more indisputable info that can be obtained directly from the disc itself, the better.
For TV, the original air date is the theatrical release date. It's just a different theater, but both are the date each was put out there for the public to watch or ignore. |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting hal9g: Quote: Yes, of course that is technically correct. I think most people would agree that for TV episodes this would be equivalent to the air-date.
Uh-oh...I'm in trouble....I'm agreeing to "functional equivalents"!!!!!!
Personally, I view TV in my home theater, so it's a theatrical release in my case anyway! I don't disagree with you, just pointing out the argument that was already made. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
|
Registered: May 26, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,879 |
| Posted: | | | | I'll throw my two cents in for agreeing that changing the rules to use the copyright date as shown on the film would be my preference as well. But, until then ... year of general theatrical release is the proper usage at this time. | | | If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a merrier world. -- Thorin Oakenshield |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,480 |
| Posted: | | | | I like the rule the way it is now. Some public domain titles have been stripped of their credits and therefore no longer have copyright dates in the film credits. I think the suggested change would lead to some very undesirable results. | | | ...James
"People fake a lot of human interactions, but I feel like I fake them all, and I fake them very well. That’s my burden, I guess." ~ Dexter Morgan |
|
Registered: March 29, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 4,479 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting m.cellophane: Quote: I like the rule the way it is now. Some public domain titles have been stripped of their credits and therefore no longer have copyright dates in the film credits. I think the suggested change would lead to some very undesirable results. +1 | | | Images from movies |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,946 |
| Posted: | | | | I don't see why some people are so keen on using the theatrical release date. Changing this to the copyright date, makes it we have another field in the database where we no longer need a 3rd party database. What do you use as a source for the release date? IMDB? Do you have a 2nd independent source (not an IMDB copy) to prove that date is correct?
And for the issue of those few public domain titles that do not have a copyright date (what % of the entire database are we taking here, 0.01% ???), it's sufficient to add an exception to the rule, stating that if a copyright date is not available, the theatrical release date must be used. | | | View my collection at http://www.chriskepolis.be/home/dvd.htm
Chris |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,394 |
| Posted: | | | | But there are some films that are released long after the copyright would indicate. I can't remember any specific titles, but many films have languished on the shelf long after they were completed which were only released after one of the actors became famous. It's not unusual for films to be "in the can" for several years before they are released. | | | Another Ken (not Ken Cole) Badges? We ain't got no badges. We don't need no badges. I don't have to show you any stinking badges. DVD Profiler user since June 15, 2001 |
|