Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum rules before posting.

Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free registration is required.

If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.

    Invelos Forums->General: General Discussion Page: 1 2  Previous   Next
Save HD-DVD! Petition Online
Author Message
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorRander
I hate mondays...
Registered: March 13, 2007
Denmark Posts: 671
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting widescreenforever:
Quote:
Also  The BD players are twice more expensive,,and in today's economy I thought the all mighty buck $poke first over quantity,., 
( not quality)  but quantity.

If you could get 3 VHS tapes for the price of two DVD's, would you do it?

I know what I would choose - my VCR had to stay hungry... 
The future is here. It's just not widely distributed yet. (William Gibson)
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorNewEnglander
Registered: 11/13/2003
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United States Posts: 1,911
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting widescreenforever:
Quote:
Quoting jgilligan:
Quote:
I figured that it was most likely going to be Blu-Ray that eventually won, but I was not going to spend any of my money until this was a done deal.

While all of the movie studios played a part in the outcome, it was the consumers who made the decision.  Blu-Ray was outselling HD DVD by a large margin.  Not that there was a high volume on either side.  But, the studios were definitely watching to see what the consumers were doing.


One thing that I don't understand though...  In reading about the coming demise of HD DVD, it was stated that the navigation on the HD DVD side was better.  How is the navigation tied to the physical media format?  In my experience as a programmer, the user interface is not tied to the underlying structure.  It is actually the purpose of the user interface to hide these complexities.

I have not used either HD DVD or Blu-Ray, so I have no personal experience with either to help me understand this.


I read somewhere that HD DVD screen menu was easier setup than Blue Ray was as per navigation.
The BD discs do hold 25% more information than HDD does.., But I hear they are more prone to scratches, than HDD is., as this information is Just under the surface of the plastic thin coating, where as HDD  'pits' are three times deeper.  Both discs prices are the same.,  Also  The BD players are twice more expensive,,and in today's economy I thought the all mighty buck $poke first over quantity,., 
( not quality)  but quantity.


There's nothing like FUD.

Blu-ray discs have a protective coating, they're not "easier to scratch" or "more prone to scratch" than HD DVD.

BD Players are twice expensive? Well, yeah since Toshiba is having another "firesale". If they were not in panick mode #2, prices would be 10%-15% off.

That being said, you can pick up a future-proof BD player starting at $399
Signature banned: Reason out of date...
 Last edited: by NewEnglander
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorwidescreenforever
Under A Double DoubleW
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
Canada Posts: 5,494
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting pplchamp:
Quote:

Blu-ray discs have a protective coating, they're not "easier to scratch" or "more prone to scratch" than HD DVD.


They all have protective coating,, but if these BD reflective pits are only .001 below the surface and HDD is .003 below,, which of the two is better protected? .. 

Which is how they get 25%  more recording doen on a single disc.
In the 60's, People took Acid to make the world Weird. Now the World is weird and People take Prozac to make it Normal.

Terry
 Last edited: by widescreenforever
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantMark Harrison
I like IMDB
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Great Rating
United States Posts: 3,321
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting widescreenforever:
Quote:
Quoting Mark Harrison:
Quote:
I was HD DVD only.  But at this point, I'm throwing my weight (buying dollars) behind Blu-ray.  Dragging this out even further isn't doing anyone any good.

So there's no way I'll touch this petition. 


Let me know when your HD DVD's are for sale..


If you're willing to buy them at full price, let me know.  Otherwise I have no plans of getting rid of perfectly good discs. 
Get the CSVExport and Database Query plug-ins here.
Create fake parent profiles to organize your collection.
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorNewEnglander
Registered: 11/13/2003
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United States Posts: 1,911
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting widescreenforever:
Quote:
Quoting pplchamp:
Quote:

Blu-ray discs have a protective coating, they're not "easier to scratch" or "more prone to scratch" than HD DVD.


They all have protective coating,, but if these BD reflective pits are only .001 below the surface and HDD is .003 below,, which of the two is better protected? .. 

Which is how they get 25%  more recording doen on a single disc.


Have you seen or touched a Blu-ray disc?

I am talking about a thick protective coating. Not a coating, a PROTECTIVE coating.

There was a video of someone trying to destoy a BR disc, I'll try and dig it up.

Signature banned: Reason out of date...
 Last edited: by NewEnglander
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantRico
Strike Three
Registered: April 8, 2007
United States Posts: 1,057
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Hi Guys,

Something missed here was HD_Dvd attempt to catapult itself, to greater acceptance than BR. Over Christmas HD Dvd player could be bought for $99.00 at Wal Mart. The failed market penetration, was not missed by Time Warner.

Also the adoption of VHS over Beta, owes much of its success to adoption of VHS by the porn industry.

Take Care
Rico
If I felt any better I'd be sick!
Envy is mental theft. If you covet another mans possessions, then you should be willing to take on his responsibilities, heartaches, and troubles, along with his money. D. Koontz
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributortweeter
I aim to misbehave
Registered: June 12, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United States Posts: 2,665
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting pplchamp:
Quote:
There was a video of someone trying to destoy a BR disc, I'll try and dig it up.

That is funny.  Of course getting the PS3 to recognize it (what they proved) and reading the whole disc start-to-finish (what they didn't show) are two different things.

I've rented stuff from Netflix that looked like it'd been strapped to the bottom of someone's foot for a day on the beach.  Some played, occasionally they didn't.

Tangentially, it made me realize we need a You Tube version of The T.W.I.N.K.I.E.S. Project
Bad movie?  You're soaking in it!
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantMark Harrison
I like IMDB
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Great Rating
United States Posts: 3,321
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Ralliart:
Quote:
HD-DVD was a good thing but I like to look for the future with more space on one disk so Blu-Ray have the storage capacity that HD-DVD dont have. And the 200gb and 1tb is comming soon for Blu-Ray


I honestly don't believe that we'll ever see anything more than 50gb on Blu-ray.  Here's why:

1) What's the need?  I can't think of any movies that won't fit on 50gb.  Sure, you could put Lost out on 2 discs instead of 5, but I don't think there's a big demand for that.  And even if there are a handful of super long movies, I don't think that's reason enough to do this.

2) Everyone knows that 50gb initially had big problems with replication.  Things seem to be getting better, but I think 4 or more layers would be a nightmare.

3) Would the current players work with more than 2 layers?  I don't know, but my instincts say no.  Blu-ray is already getting a small amount of bad press for their various profiles and at least in that case, any player should play the movie at least.  If you have players that won't even play the movie, that's going to be a PR disaster.

4) I think there are cheaper options for computer backup than optical disc.

For the record, I did believe in 51gb HD DVDs.  I don't believe the need was there for larger discs (in all but a few cases of course).  But it would have been a PR goldmine to say HD DVD's could actually hold more than Blu-ray discs.  Wether they would have ever been used is another question.  But they had good reason to try.  And there were lots of rumors that suggested that current players would have been compatible.  That's not too hard when you don't have a lot of companies producing players.
Get the CSVExport and Database Query plug-ins here.
Create fake parent profiles to organize your collection.
DVD Profiler Unlimited Registrantkovacs01
Registered: March 13, 2007
Posts: 181
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
BD discs arent more prone to scratch, but if you do scratch them they are done, they skip, freeze, etc and become pretty much worthless with a minor looking scratch.  By the way, I have a bd-up5000 so i could care less about a format war.  just stating the experience i have.
 Last edited: by kovacs01
    Invelos Forums->General: General Discussion Page: 1 2  Previous   Next