Author |
Message |
Registered: March 21, 2007 | Posts: 103 |
| Posted: | | | | I am trying to get my head around how best to submit a contribution,, it's a boxset of a TV Series with 21 Disc's, it comes as a slip case with 3 keep cases inside ( each keep case contains 1 or 2 seasons), none of the keep cases have any UPC (just the slip case), each keep case contains between 7 and 9 discs.
My feeling at moment is to submit 3 child profiles with a Disc ID of the first disc in the set?
Thoughts?... | | | Last edited: by dbisping |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 17,334 |
| Posted: | | | | In my opinion it should be a profile for each disc as that gives us better information... As I said in the thread I linked below... it is better to have a profile per disc because... 1. It gives us more accurate detail what is on each disc. 2. The handling of the cast and crew lists are easier since the info is for that very disc instead of grouped to a whole season under 1 profile 3. You can track your watched status much easier at disc level. As you can mark each disc as watched as you watch them instead of waiting till you watch the entire series. See THIS THREAD for the last time this was brought up. | | | Pete |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | I agree with my hairy friend...profile per disc, not per case. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
|
Registered: July 31, 2008 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,506 |
| Posted: | | | | I agree with Addicted & TMM. It's a pain when situations like the come up but it's the only way at this time. |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,744 |
| |
Registered: March 19, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,018 |
| Posted: | | | | I beg to differ in this case. The rules say that "Individual profiles for each disc may be submitted if desired, but this is not required." For me this implies that season-level profiles take precedence over disc-level profiles. Now I do hope that at some point we'll have more profile identifiers than the two we have now, so all of this becomes mute... |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,293 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting dee1959jay: Quote: I beg to differ in this case. The rules say that "Individual profiles for each disc may be submitted if desired, but this is not required." For me this implies that season-level profiles take precedence over disc-level profiles. Personally I agree, they should be broken down to season level (Id's by the first disc of that season if it's not one season per disc)... but disenters will point out that the rules also say "...where multiple Complete TV Series are packaged together, the Box-set rules can be applied" (my emphasis) not "shall be applied" so that too is optional. FWIW I belive it should be worded "should be applied where possible" but, at the moment, it isnt' Quote: Now I do hope that at some point we'll have more profile identifiers than the two we have now, so all of this becomes mute... I can only echo this sentiment as at present it's "first one wins" as either side can legitimately No vote against any change. | | | It is dangerous to be right in matters where established men are wrong |
|
| T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,736 |
| Posted: | | | | I'm with dee1959jay and Voltaire53. As I see it, disc profiles are optional, but season profiles are a must. | | | Last edited: by T!M |
|
Registered: March 19, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,018 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Voltaire53: Quote: disenters will point out that the rules also say "...where multiple Complete TV Series are packaged together, the Box-set rules can be applied" (my emphasis) not "shall be applied" so that too is optional. Sure, that's in the rules as well. However I believe in this case this is irrelevant, because this rule is about the relationship between the slip case (parent profile) and whatever comes underneath (child profiles) - it defines what should go into the parent (slip case) profile. That's not the issue here - this rule doesn't specify WHAT should be profiled as child profile. Surely, no one is questioning that the slip case should be profiled, as it's the only item with a UPC, nor what should go into its profile. |
|
Registered: March 21, 2007 | Posts: 103 |
| Posted: | | | | Plenty of things to think about. Thanks to everyone that took the time to respond.
Dave... |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,293 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting dee1959jay: Quote: Quoting Voltaire53:
Quote: disenters will point out that the rules also say "...where multiple Complete TV Series are packaged together, the Box-set rules can be applied" (my emphasis) not "shall be applied" so that too is optional.
Sure, that's in the rules as well. However I believe in this case this is irrelevant, because this rule is about the relationship between the slip case (parent profile) and whatever comes underneath (child profiles) - it defines what should go into the parent (slip case) profile. That's not the issue here - this rule doesn't specify WHAT should be profiled as child profile. Surely, no one is questioning that the slip case should be profiled, as it's the only item with a UPC, nor what should go into its profile. Sorry, I should have quoted the full Rule: "In rare cases where multiple Complete TV Series are packaged together, the Box-set rules can be applied, treating each series like a single film - applying the above rules for it’s individual profile." So this actually DOES state what should be profiled as a child profile - each series. | | | It is dangerous to be right in matters where established men are wrong |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 17,334 |
| Posted: | | | | As I stated in the thread I linked to the rules says it CAN be treated as a boxset per season/series not that it has to be. Both are definitely possibilities and neither is mandatory. It is really up to the person doing it to decide as both is correct per the Rules. | | | Pete |
|
| T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,736 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Voltaire53: Quote: So this actually DOES state what should be profiled as a child profile - each series. Couldn't agree more! However, due to unfortunate wording, we're once again stuck with the dreaded "first one in wins" principle... I really hope this gets addressed soon. | | | Last edited: by T!M |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 951 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting dbisping: Quote: I am trying to get my head around how best to submit a contribution,, it's a boxset of a TV Series with 21 Disc's, it comes as a slip case with 3 keep cases inside ( each keep case contains 1 or 2 seasons), none of the keep cases have any UPC (just the slip case), each keep case contains between 7 and 9 discs.
My feeling at moment is to submit 3 child profiles with a Disc ID of the first disc in the set?
Thoughts?... Problem with trying to do season level profiles for complete series sets is the ones that don't have UPCs on the season cases usually the discs are the same as the disc sold in the retail season releases with UPCs. So the disc IDs are already in the database associated with each disc. In these cases the only way you can usually contribute them is doing the disc level profiles. | | | Are you local? This is a local shop the strangers you would bring would not understand us, our customs, our local ways. |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 951 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting T!M: Quote: Quoting Voltaire53:
Quote: So this actually DOES state what should be profiled as a child profile - each series. Couldn't agree more! However, due to unfortunate wording, we're once again stuck with the dreaded "first one in wins" principle... I really hope this gets addressed soon. Actually "first one in wins" isn't used here. Before we allowed TV seasons to be profiled by disc level. We did allow complete series to be profiled using box set rules. Example "Buffy Chosen Collection" which was profiled using the first disc ID of each season. When the disc level profiles for seasons were allowed any complete series that were profiled using the box set rules were wiped out with the disc ID information of the retail seasons. Contributors cited first release wins not first profiled. This whole issue kinda p'd me off since we had a number of our so called we only follow the rules contributors contributing disc IDs of season sets before Ken made his ruling on allowing seasons to be profiled by disc level. Okay ... I guess I'll get off my soap box now... | | | Are you local? This is a local shop the strangers you would bring would not understand us, our customs, our local ways. |
|
Registered: September 18, 2008 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,650 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting T!M: Quote: Quoting Voltaire53:
Quote: So this actually DOES state what should be profiled as a child profile - each series. Couldn't agree more! However, due to unfortunate wording, we're once again stuck with the dreaded "first one in wins" principle... I really hope this gets addressed soon. This things need to be addressed (along with cast and crew issues) as a priority instead of adding options like 5th Sound-Mixer etc. Especially seen as some of these issues seem to have been around for a while. |
|